You are here: Home > Langley > Langley City > 4929 207a Street > Parkview Place
Page Views: 2856
Building & Condo information

Parkview Place

4929 207a Street


Langley, V3A 6V9 F6A - Langley City

  • Levels: 2
  • Suites: 40
  • Status: Completed
  • Built: 1979
  • Title To Land: Freehold Strata
  • Building Type: Strata Townhouses
  • Strata Plan: NWS804
  • Bldg#: 4857

Contact Us®












Yes No

Welcome to our Strata Minutes section - these are private. In order to get access to these Strata Minutes you must get a password from us. Please call us at 604-671-7000 or Contact Us.








Receive more information about Building - Parkview Place


Yes No











Receive more information about
Parkview Place


Yes No











Parkview Place MLS® Listings

"Sorry there are no listings. Please click here to view Langley City listings"

Building Info

Parkview Place - 4929 207A Street Langley, BC V3A 6V9, NWS804 - Located in the heart of Langley on 207A Street and 49A Avenue. Parkview Place offers 40 townhomes built in 1978 that are professionally managed. This is a central location close to bus stops, Valley Centre, IGA restaurants, Langley City Park, golf course, Simmonds Elementary, HD Stafford Secondary, recreation, community centre and much more! Direct access to major transportation routes including Fraser Highway and the Trans-Canada Highway, allows an easy commute to surrounding destinations. Homes feature two storeys, spacious living areas, in-suite laundry, patio and fenced backyards that back onto a beautiful greenbelt. A unique feature of Parkview Place is homes are situated on a neighbourhood street with a Cul-De-Sac and not in a complex. This is a multiple address tonwhome community including 20 units on 4850 to 4860 207 Street, 4 units on 20712 49A Avenue, 10 units on 4929 to 4939 207A Street and 6 units on 4857 207A Street. Parkview Place is in a desirable neighbourhood that offers convenient townhome living for the whole family!

Strata Sub Categories: Strata Townhouses
 

Parkview Place Technical Info

Building Name Parkview Place
Address 4929 207a Street
City Langley
Neighborhood Langley City
Listing Price Range N/A
Floors 2
Units in Development: 40
Units in Strata:40
Property Types Freehold Strata
Sub Categories:Strata Townhouses
Year Built 1979
Restrictions Details
Strata Plan NWS804
Title to Land Freehold Strata
  

Parkview Place Videos

Parkview Place - 4929 207A Street Surrey

Parkview Place Maps (Google, Google Street View, Bing Aerial View, Area Condos, Walk Score)

Google Street View
Google Map
Bing Areal View
Please click the image above to view respective full map. This will open in a new window.

Featured Properties

607 1833 CROWE STR.. 2 Bed, 2 Bath,1058 Sqft.  $1,080,000 RE/MAX Crest Realty
278 ALLISON STREET 3 Bed, 1 Bath,1248 Sqft.  $3,100,000 RE/MAX Crest Realty
7373 12TH AVENUE 4 Bed, 2 Bath,1764 Sqft.  $1,800,000 RE/MAX Crest Realty
2710 128 W CORDOVA.. 2 Bed, 2 Bath,1158 Sqft.  $1,295,000 RE/MAX Crest Realty
2003 999 SEYMOUR S.. 2 Bed, 1 Bath,711 Sqft.  $875,000.00 RE/MAX Crest Realty
910 ROBINSON STREET 5 Bed, 2 Bath,2000 Sqft.  $1,490,000.00 RE/MAX Crest Realty
1203 1277 NELSON S.. 2 Bed, 2 Bath,948 Sqft.  $897,000.00 RE/MAX Crest Realty
316 8520 GENERAL C.. 2 Bed, 2 Bath,1018 Sqft.  $499,999.00 RE/MAX Crest Realty

Other Buildings in Complex/Area

  1. A Parkview Place - 4939 207A STREET - NWS804
  2. B Parkview Place - 4857 207A STREET - NWS804
  3. C Parkview Place - 4860 207TH STREET - NWS804
  4. D Parkview Place - 20712 49A AVE - NWS804
  5. E Parkview Place - 4856 207TH STREET - NWS804
  6. F Parkview Place - 4850 207TH STREET - NWS804
  7. G City Park - 4840 207TH STREET - NWS2552
  8. H Yorkson Creek - 8328 207A STREET - EPS936
  9. I Yorkson Creek - 8288 207A STREET - EPS1269
View All Buildings in Langley

September 2021 Market Insights

August 2021 Market Insights

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) reports that residential home sales in the region totalled 3,152 in August 2021, a 3.4 per cent increase from the 3,047 sales recorded in August 2020, and a 5.2 per cent decrease from the 3,326 homes sold in July 2021.

July 2021 Market Insights

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) reports that residential home sales in the region totalled 3,326 in July 2021, a 6.3 per cent increase from the 3,128 sales recorded in July 2020, and an 11.6 per cent decrease from the 3,762 homes sold in June 2021.

June 2021 Market Insights

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) reports that residential home sales in the region totalled 3,762 in June 2021, a 54 per cent increase from the 2,443 sales recorded in June 2020, and an 11.9 per cent decrease from the 4,268 homes sold in May 2021.

May 2021 Market Insights

The Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) reports that residential home sales in the region totalled 4,268 in May 2021, a 187.4 per cent increase from the 1,485 sales recorded in May 2020, and a 13 per cent decrease from the 4,908 homes sold

Real Estate Related News Articles(Sun and Province) Search News  

Mandarin 
# Article Publish Date Source
1 Growth in condo market share across the Canadian real estate market in 2021

Canadian real estate market sees higher share of condos in 2021, in wake of rising detached housing values; affordability shifts demand for condominiums into high gear in 2021


Canadian Real Estate Report: 2021 Housing Impacts to Condo Sector #LesTwarog
2021/10/19 other
2 CREA and RECO issued a notice about steering to over 93,000 real estate agents

"In addition to being illegal, the conduct undermines consumer protection, consumer confidence and the reputation of the real estate profession as a whole," said the notice.

Across the country, the National Realtor Code of Ethics, as well as provincial real estate laws, dictate that agents must act with honesty and promote the interests of the individual they represent. Some provincial laws, including in Alberta and Ontario, address the issue of steering specifically.


Real estate agents caught on hidden camera breaking the law, steering buyers f
2021/10/15 other
3 Canadians hoping to enter the housing market to homeownership for qualified first-time buyers

 It remains to be seen whether proposed tweaks can revive the much-maligned federal program

On paper, it seemed a welcome break for Canadians hoping to enter the housing market: a federal incentive program aimed at reducing the monthly mortgage burden and easing the passage to home ownership for qualified first-time buyers.

Over two years after its introduction, though, the jury is still out on whether the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive, unveiled by the federal government in September 2019, has had any significant impact in addressing the mounting challenges faced by would-be homeowners across the country.

Figures released to Parliament in April painted a damning picture of the program, revealing that it had seen an uptake of just over 9,000 successful applicants since its introduction – with the $170 million released in incentives representing a small fraction of the program’s $1.25 billion overall value.

One of the most significant stumbling blocks in the incentive, which offers mortgage relief through a shared-equity program between homebuyers and the government, appeared to be the fact that ever-soaring house prices across much of Canada meant that it had little impact on prospective buyers in the country’s hottest markets.

While the government introduced changes to the program late last year – announcing increased household income and buyer’s income thresholds for Vancouver, Victoria and Toronto – those amendments still meant that the program’s maximum eligible home price remained well below the going rate in those markets.

The program has faced staunch opposition from the get-go, with Conservative MPs Tom Kmiec and Stephanie Kusie urging the government to scrap the scheme in May 2020 after it had been in operation for less than a year.

Read more: Conservative MPs urge feds to eliminate First-Time Homebuyer Incentive

Still, the governing Liberals have stuck resolutely by the plan, announcing in their platform prior to September’s federal election – in which they were returned to government, having emerged once more as the largest party in Parliament – that they would retain and rejig the scheme if re-elected.

Under that platform’s proposals, changes to the program would give applicants a choice between the current shared-equity approach and a loan that’s repayable when the property is eventually sold – theoretically allowing new homebuyers to keep more of any increase in their home’s value while also reducing mortgage costs.

CanWise Financial president and RateHub co-founder James Laird told Canadian Mortgage Professional in recent weeks that the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive was an “illogical, complex program” that made little sense and should have been abandoned completely, rather than reworked.

In Newfoundland and Labrador, Robert Jennings (pictured top), owner and mortgage broker at East Coast Mortgage Brokers, said that while the scheme was often raised as a topic among clients, actual uptake had proven limited.

“I would say we have a fair amount of conversations, but it doesn’t lead to a lot of usage,” he said. “The usage rate is very low. I believe if I were to pinpoint it, the lean on the property [government involvement] would be really discouraging to a young, proud first-time homebuyer.

“I feel like maybe in Newfoundland in particular, there’s a home ownership pride that they don’t want to share or give up… Of course, there’s the eligibility issues as well. It seems like in a lot of cases trying to put a square peg in a round hole.”

Read next: What the Canada election result means for the mortgage industry

While Jennings said that the scheme had arguably fallen short in its attempts to create a smoother path to first-time home ownership, he believes efforts at a federal level to address the country’s growing housing affordability crisis are to be applauded.

“Everybody made it a big deal in their platforms – not just first-time home ownership, but home ownership in general and affordability,” he said. “I just really hope that they re-evaluate everything.

“They had good intentions, but I feel like they missed the mark. There’s no reason not to try; the problem’s not going away. I’d like to see what happens when the dust settles and I hope that it [the housing crisis] remains a priority, because they certainly made it seem like it would on the campaign trail.”

A good place to start, Jennings said, would be for the federal government to work collaboratively with stakeholders and those who work daily in the mortgage and housing industries – whether that be on changes to the stress test or potential longer-term amortizations.

“What I want is them not to do things blindly,” he said, “to embrace input, do their homework and try to get it done – but also get it done right.”

 

 

Copyright © 1996-2021 Key Media, Inc.


Can the First-Time Home Buyer Incentive be salvaged? #LesTwarog
2021/10/14 other
4 Discover in Surrey the New Bristol Estate transforming its neighborhood includes 6.27 acre property

The Surrey Centre Official Community Plan aims to transform the neighbourhood from a suburban town centre into a walkable, high-density and transit-oriented downtown for the South of Fraser region. The density and mix of uses is meant to create a city centre that is “more animated, livable and a place that thrives economically where residents can work, play, and live in their neighbourhood.”


New Bristol Estates in Surrey includes over 2,000 homes #LesTwarog
2021/10/13 other
5 Suspension against real estate agent Shahin Behroyan handed down in 2020 | B.C.’s Financial Services Tribunal

The real estate council didn't agree, arguing Behroyan's willingness to "defraud a client signals an issue concerning good character and suitability that represents a threat to the public, and a threat to public confidence in the real estate industry."


West Vancouver real estate agent loses appeal of five-year license suspension
2021/10/08 other
More News

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent in Unknown on line 0